Quoted By Credit.com
*Photo by Sean MacEntee is licensed under CC 2.0. *
I was recently quoted in Credit.com’s article, “Do Squatters Actually Have Rights?” You can read the entire article here.
The article addresses the concept of squatters’ rights, the idea that someone can simply move into someone else’s—often abandoned—property and thereby acquire rights to occupy it. I serve as a source for the article, providing insight into the actual provisions of various real estate laws and how they implicate the notion of squatters’ rights. As I state and the article supports, squatters’ rights are largely a myth, representing a distortion of the common law concept of adverse possession.
The law of adverse possession largely developed as a way to settle boundary disputes, not as a means to circumvent property rights to gain ownership of someone else’s house. Because taking ownership of property by adverse possession takes several years of open, notorious use of the property without the permission of the landowner, the ability of someone to gain ownership of a home merely by living in it is theoretically possible but practically inconceivable.
Garrett Ham
Attorney, veteran, and servant leader writing about faith, constitutional principles, and community from Northwest Arkansas.
More about Garrett →Related Posts
The Courage to Speak for Rule of Law
We must awaken the courage that has defined the American ethos for generations, or we may forever lose the founder’s legacy.
We Must Not Yield on Due Process
In this post, I reflect upon the sacrosanct nature of due process and why we should safeguard it at all costs. This content uses referral...
Week 4 of JASOC: Get In The Courtroom
In this post, I discuss finally being able to get in the courtroom in the fourth week of JASOC.
Stay Informed
Get new writing on faith, law, and service delivered to your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.